|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Jan 2009): |
Influence of feedback and prior experience on pacing during a 4-km cycle time trial.
Full Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the importance of distance knowledge, distance feedback, and prior experience on the setting of a pacing strategy. METHODS: Eighteen well-trained male cyclists were randomly assigned to a control (CON) group or an experimental (EXP) group and performed four consecutive 4-km time trials (TT), separated by a 17-min recovery. The CON group received prior knowledge of distance to be cycled and received distance feedback throughout each TT; the EXP group received neither but knew that each TT was of the same distance. RESULTS: The EXP group was significantly slower than the CON group to complete TT1 (367.4 +/- 21 vs 409.4 +/- 45.5 s, P < 0.001). Differences between groups in completion time reduced over successive TT (CON TT4 = 373.9 +/- 20 s vs EXP TT4 = 373.8 +/- 14.4 s), shown by a significant linear contrast (F1,16 = 12.39, P < 0.0005). Mean speed and power output also showed significantly reduced differences between groups over successive TT (P < 0.0005). However, peak power output showed no such convergence between groups over TT. End blood lactate was significantly different between groups in TT1, but differences between groups converged with successive TT. CONCLUSION: The progressively improving completion times in the EXP group show that distance feedback is not essential in developing an appropriate pacing strategy. Prior experience of an unknown distance appears to allow the creation of an internal, relative distance that is used to establish a pacing strategy.
Author information
Author/s: Mauger, Alexis R (AR); Jones, Andrew M (AM); Williams, Craig A (CA);
Affiliation: School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom.
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal: Medicine and science in sports and exercise (Med Sci Sports Exerc), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2009-Feb; vol 41 (issue 2) : pp 451-8
Dates: Created 2009/01/20; Completed 2009/05/08;
PMID: 19127178, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 5/8/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.