|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Apr 2009): |
Confirmatory adaptive designs with Bayesian decision tools for a targeted therapy in oncology.
Full Abstract
The ability to select a sensitive patient population may be crucial for the development of a targeted therapy. Identifying such a population with an acceptable level of confidence may lead to an inflation in development time and cost. We present an approach that allows to decrease these costs and to increase the reliability of the population selection. It is based on an actual adaptive phase II/III design and uses Bayesian decision tools to select the population of interest at an interim analysis. The primary endpoint is assumed to be the time to some event like e.g. progression. It is shown that the use of appropriately stratified logrank tests in the adaptive test procedure guarantees overall type I error control also when using information on patients that are censored at the adaptive interim analysis. The use of Bayesian decision tools for the population selection decision making is discussed. Simulations are presented to illustrate the operating characteristics of the study design relative to a more traditional development approach. Estimation of treatment effects is considered as well. Copyright (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Author information
Author/s: Brannath, Werner (W); Zuber, Emmanuel (E); Branson, Michael (M); Bretz, Frank (F); Gallo, Paul (P); Posch, Martin (M); Racine-Poon, Amy (A);
Affiliation: Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Statistics in medicine (Stat Med), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2009-May; vol 28 (issue 10) : pp 1445-63
Dates: Created 2009/04/13; Completed 2009/07/01; Revised 2009/07/17;
PMID: 19266565, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 7/25/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Prospective clinical trials of biotherapies in solid tumors: a 5-year survey.
30 Dec 2004 - Approaches for optimal sequential decision analysis in clinical trials.
30 Aug 1998 - Stat bite: Treatment trials in the PDQ clinical trials database, by phase.
13 Sep 2004 - Continual reassessment method: a likelihood approach.
30 May 1996 - Nonparametric estimation and testing in a cure model.
29 Nov 1992 - Superiority inferences on individual endpoints following noninferiority testing in clinical trials.
29 Sep 2008 - Statistics in clinical trials.
30 Dec 2003 - Optimal designs for evaluating a series of treatments.
27 Feb 2001 - The role of COMT inhibition in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
11 Jan 2004 - Bayesian approaches to joint cure-rate and longitudinal models with applications to cancer vaccine trials.
30 Aug 2003
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.