Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 30 Jul 2009):

Comparison of shape-based analysis of retinal nerve fiber layer data obtained From OCT and GDx-VCC.

Full Abstract

PURPOSE: To directly compare in 1 population: (1) the performance of Optical Coherence Tomograph (OCT) and GDx-Variable Corneal Compensator (VCC) when using Wavelet-Fourier Analysis (WFA) and Fast-Fourier Analysis (FFA), (2) the performance of these shape-based and standard metrics, and (3) the shape of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) temporal, superior, nasal, inferior, temporal (TSNIT) curves obtained by the 2 different devices. METHODS: RNFL estimates were obtained from 136 eyes of 136 individuals (73 healthy and 63 mild glaucoma). WFA and FFA with and without asymmetry measures were performed on the TSNIT RNFL estimates to identify glaucoma from healthy eyes. Performance of WFA, FFA, and the standard metrics of OCT (Inferior Average) and GDX-VCC (Nerve Fiber Indicator) was evaluated by calculating receiver operating characteristic area. Measurements were obtained at a custom radius (33 to 41 pixels) for GDx-VCC to match the OCT radius (1.73 mm). RESULTS: WFA and FFA shape analysis significantly improved performance of both OCT (0.937) and GDx-VCC (0.913) compared with Inferior Average and Nerve Fiber Indicator (0.852 and 0.833, respectively). With either shape-based or standard metrics, OCT performance was slightly, but not significantly, better than GDx-VCC performance. Comparison of RNFL curves revealed that the GDx-VCC curves were more jagged and the peaks shifted more nasally when compared with the OCT RNFL curves. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of both OCT and GDx-VCC devices are improved by shape-based analysis methods. Classification performance was greater when using WFA for the OCT, and greater with FFA for the GDx-VCC. Significant differences between the machines exist in the measured TSNIT thicknesses, possibly because of GDx-VCC's measurements being affected by polarization magnitude varying with angle.

 

Author information

Author/s: Gunvant, Pinakin (P); Zheng, Yufeng (Y); Essock, Edward A (EA); Parikh, Rajul S (RS); Prabakaran, Selvaraj (S); Babu, Jonnadula Ganesh (JG); Shekar, Chandra G (CG); Thomas, Ravi (R);

Affiliation: Department of Research, Southern College of Optometry, TN 38104-2222, USA. contact(-atsign-)pinakin-gunvant.com

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Journal: Journal of glaucoma (J Glaucoma), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2009-Aug; vol 18 (issue 6) : pp 464-71

Dates: Created 2009/08/14; Completed 2009/10/07;

PMID: 19680055, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 10/7/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Related articles

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.

Related Article Map

4/29/2004
11/29/2008
Higher Relevance Score (100)
Lower Relevance Score (73)

Legend: - FREE Full text Article. - Abstract only. - Title only. More help.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy LLC 2003-2009 - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index